• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

OINDPnews


Copley Scientific banner
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Features
    • Medical
    • Regulatory
    • Products and Services
    • People
  • Events
  • Suppliers
    • Supplier listing and advertising options
    • Capsules and blisters
    • Consultants
    • Contract research
    • Contract manufacturing
    • Devices
    • Education
    • Excipients
      • Clinical Technology
    • Filling equipment
    • Instruments
    • Particle manufacturing
    • Software and modeling
  • Jobs
  • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White papers
  • LGWP Propellants
    • HFA 152a
    • HFO-1234ze(E)
    • LGWP Regulation
  • Contact

US Senate committee launches investigation of inhaler prices

Members of the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) have sent letters to the CEOs of AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, and Teva asserting that “There is no reason for inhalers to be so expensive” and that each company “has manipulated the regulatory system to extend its monopolies over its inhaler products.” The letters demand that the companies provide the committee with extensive documentation, including internal emails and messages, related to pricing, life cycle management, and agreements with other companies related to competing products.

Each of the letters states that “The major brand-name pharmaceutical companies brought in more than $178 billion between 2000 and 2021 on inhaler products, revenues that are a direct result of the outrageous prices the companies charge,” with the high prices in turn resulting from each company’s “efforts to block generic competition.” Committee members cite retail prices of almost $500 for AirDuo Respiclick; more than $600 for Spiriva Respimat; over $700 for Bevespi Aerosphere; and nearly $800 for Trelegy Ellipta; each of which they describe as “a staggering amount.”

In each of the letters, the committee members accuse the companies of specific anti-competitive practices related to one or more brand-name inhalers, including the listing of inhaler device patents in the Orange Book. The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently initiated a review of dozens of inhaler device patents and issued warning letters related to wrongful listing of the patents in the Orange Book.

The letters also demand communications related to specific product development and marketing decisions such as AstraZeneca’s sales of only Symbicort MDI and not Symbicort Turbuhaler in the US; Boehringer Ingelheim’s introduction of Spiriva Respimat and plans for Spiriva HandiHaler; GSK’s decisions related to a switch from Flovent Diskus to Arnuity Ellipta; and Teva’s switch from QVAR to QVAR RediHaler.

Read the US Senate HELP committee letter to AstraZeneca.
Read the US Senate HELP committee letter to Boehringer Ingelheim.
Read the US Senate HELP committee letter to GSK.
Read the US Senate HELP committee letter to Teva.

Share

published on January 8, 2024

Primary Sidebar

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter

Upcoming Events
Sponsored by Intertek

Want information about upcoming OINDP-related events delivered directly to your inbox? click here

  • June 17-June 18: Rescon Europe 2025, Paris, France
  • June 19-June 20: Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) Technology Training Course, online
  • June 22-June 25: ISAM Congress 2025, Washington, DC, USA
  • June 25-June 25: SMI.London 2025, London, UK
  • September 18-September 19: IPAC-RS Nasal Innovation Forum, West Trenton, NJ, USA
  • See all upcoming events

    Secondary Sidebar

    Suppliers

    Capsules and blisters
    Consultants
    Contract research
    Contract manufacturing
    Devices
    Education
    Excipients
    Filling equipment
    Instruments
    Particle manufacturing
    Software and modeling
    Proveris_180x150a
    © 2025 OINDPnews