• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

OINDPnews


Intertek banner
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Features
    • Medical
    • Regulatory
    • Products and Services
    • People
  • Events
  • Suppliers
    • Supplier listing and advertising options
    • Capsules and blisters
    • Consultants
    • Contract research
    • Contract manufacturing
    • Devices
    • Education
    • Excipients
      • Clinical Technology
    • Filling equipment
    • Instruments
    • Particle manufacturing
    • Software and modeling
  • Jobs
  • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White papers
  • LGWP Propellants
    • HFA 152a
    • HFO-1234ze(E)
    • LGWP Regulation
  • Contact

United Therapeutics request for review of PTAB decision on Tyvaso patent is denied

According to Liquidia, the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) will not review a July 2022 Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) decision which determined that none of the claims in US Patent No. 10,716,793, which covers United Therapeutics’ Tyvaso inhaled treprostinil, are valid. United Therapeutics had requested both a POP review of the PTAB decision and a rehearing by the PTAB; the PTAB is still considering the rehearing request, Liquidia said. Final approval of Liquidia’s NDA for its Yutrepia treprostinil DPI, which was tentatively approved by the FDA in November 2021, is on hold while litigation continues.

After the FDA accepted Liquidia’s NDA for its Yutrepia treprostinil DPI for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in April 2020, United Therapeutics filed suit, alleging infringement of US Patent No. 9,604,901 and US Patent No. 9,593,066. In July 2020, The ‘793 patent was issued in July 2020, and United Therapeutics added claims related to infringement of that patent at that time. 

In September 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware ruled that Yutrepia would infringe claims contained in the 066 and 793 patents but also found that the claims that would be infringed in the ‘066 patent are invalid and and that the only valid claim in that patent would not be infringed.

Liquidia CEO Roger Jeffs said, “Yesterday’s decision clears the way for the PTAB to make a final decision with respect to UTC’s rehearing request. We believe that the requested clarification of the PTAB’s original decision will help to make the PTAB’s decision even stronger. We remain confident that the rehearing request will be denied and that the PTAB’s favorable decision will be affirmed on appeal, thereby unlocking the path to potential approval of Yutrepia by mid-2024, if not earlier.”

Read the Liquidia press release.

Share

published on October 28, 2022

Primary Sidebar

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter

Upcoming Events
Sponsored by Intertek

Want information about upcoming OINDP-related events delivered directly to your inbox? click here

  • June 17-June 18: Rescon Europe 2025, Paris, France
  • June 19-June 20: Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) Technology Training Course, online
  • June 22-June 25: ISAM Congress 2025, Washington, DC, USA
  • June 25-June 25: SMI.London 2025, London, UK
  • September 18-September 19: IPAC-RS Nasal Innovation Forum, West Trenton, NJ, USA
  • See all upcoming events

    Secondary Sidebar

    Suppliers

    Capsules and blisters
    Consultants
    Contract research
    Contract manufacturing
    Devices
    Education
    Excipients
    Filling equipment
    Instruments
    Particle manufacturing
    Software and modeling
    Proveris_180x150a
    © 2025 OINDPnews