• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

OINDPnews


Proveris Scientific
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Features
    • Medical
    • Regulatory
    • Products and Services
    • People
  • Events
  • Suppliers
    • Supplier listing and advertising options
    • Capsules and blisters
    • Consultants
    • Contract research
    • Contract manufacturing
    • Devices
    • Education
    • Excipients
      • Clinical Technology
    • Filling equipment
    • Instruments
    • Particle manufacturing
    • Software and modeling
  • Jobs
  • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White papers
  • LGWP Propellants
    • HFA 152a
    • HFO-1234ze(E)
    • LGWP Regulation
  • Contact

Copley Scientific’s Mark Copley answers questions about USP Chapter <1602>

Both spacers and VHCs introduce a certain amount of “dead” volume that can impact both the drug quantity and the APSD of the emitted dose because larger particles tend to stick to the interior walls of the add-on device due to inertial impaction caused by the high velocity, ballistic nature of the aerosol generation.

In addition, any delay between actuation and inhalation allows time for processes such as enhanced aerosol expansion and co-solvent evaporation, gravitational sedimentation, and electrostatic deposition to take place, potentially affecting the emitted dose.

Q: How do the new testing methods account for use of a spacer/VHC?
A: Patients using a spacer or VHC are normally instructed to breathe tidally instead of using one steady forced inhalation as they would with an MDI alone, so the new methods require use of a breathing simulator to measure ED rather than a constant flow rate vacuum pump. The breathing simulator is capable of replicating the sinusoidal tidal breathing profiles generated by various types of patients, with profiles covering neonate, infant, child and adult patient groups.

The collection apparatus for measuring ED from an MDI with a spacer/VHC also differs slightly from the apparatus for testing MDIs alone, although the dose is collected onto a filter for subsequent chemical analysis in much the same way.

The new method for ED testing of VHCs includes an assessment of the valve mechanism’s efficiency by simulating the best case “fully coordinated” actuation, where the patient inhales exactly at the same time as actuation, as well as the worst-case scenario of “fully un-coordinated” actuation and inhalation, where the patient exhales at precisely the point of MDI actuation. The ratio of ED values under each condition defines the efficiency of the valve.

For measurement of APSD with spacers/VHCs, time delays are introduced between MDI actuation and sampling by the cascade impactor, which by its design is a constant flow rate device and is operated at a flow rate that is broadly appropriate for the patient category. The delays, which are typically 2, 5 or 10 seconds between MDI actuation and the onset of flow, simulate conditions where the patient fails to co-ordinate actuation with inhalation.

Share
« Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5Next page »

published on April 19, 2018

Primary Sidebar

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter

Upcoming Events
Sponsored by Intertek

Want information about upcoming OINDP-related events delivered directly to your inbox? click here

  • June 17-June 18: Rescon Europe 2025, Paris, France
  • June 19-June 20: Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) Technology Training Course, online
  • June 22-June 25: ISAM Congress 2025, Washington, DC, USA
  • June 25-June 25: SMI.London 2025, London, UK
  • September 18-September 19: IPAC-RS Nasal Innovation Forum, West Trenton, NJ, USA
  • See all upcoming events

    Secondary Sidebar

    Suppliers

    Capsules and blisters
    Consultants
    Contract research
    Contract manufacturing
    Devices
    Education
    Excipients
    Filling equipment
    Instruments
    Particle manufacturing
    Software and modeling
    Bespak Leading the Green Transition banner
    © 2025 OINDPnews